Television viewing
66 YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004
© World Advertising Research Center 2004TV VIEWING
T
HE IMPORTANCE OF children asconsumers is now acknowledged.
According to McNeal (1992), and
Schiffman and Kanuk (1997), in the US child
consumers are not simply a market of 37 million
potential young buyers. Globally, this market is
exceptional because they are considered to
influence three marketplaces. Firstly, young consumers
are a primary market, they have their
own money to spend on whatever they desire
and they may also be asked to do shopping for
the family. Secondly, they are a market influencer,
they can directly and indirectly influence
the shopping habits of others, including their
parents. Thirdly, they are a future market who
will themselves become consumers of all products
and services in years to come.
The unique market position of the young consumer
has meant that increasingly large budgets
are being committed by marketing departments
to reach and influence children. However, marketers
need to continually rethink their strategies
and assumptions, and make cost efficiency their
priority. This means that marketers need strategies
that target this young sector that are similar
to those used for adults. Stipp (1993) comments
on how different consumer groups have dissimilar
attitudes, interests and behaviour, and taking
these factors into account is likely to improve
marketing success. Needless to say, this premise
applies equally to children as to any other group.
Stipp (1993) further stated that, of the many
ways to target young people, television provides
the broadest and most frequent reach.
Although there has been a lot of discrepancy
about the accuracy of television ratings for
children, it still provides the useful data for
studying this audience.Television attracts large
audiences of young consumers and they
clearly do not only watch the programmes
specifically produced for them. It is expensive
to advertise on prime-time shows, yet more
advertisers are looking beyond children’s programmes
to reach target audiences of children
and parents.
McNeil and Ji (1999) determined that television
is the most important source of new
product information for children and this
importance increases significantly as they get
older (in comparison with other mass media –
radio, magazines, newspapers and outdoor ads).
They posited that through television advertising
children learn about new brands and products,
how to use the products and who uses them.
Children develop knowledge and opinions about
the products and show preferences. The children
may then buy advertised products
themselves or ask their parents to purchase for
them.
This study evaluates the importance of television
in influencing children’s consumer
behaviour.We considered the influence of children’s
gender, parental income and personality
traits on their television viewing habits, and the
relationship between television viewing and
children’s consumer socialisation.
Noor Hasmini Abd Ghani
, University Utara, Malaysia, looks at the influence oftelevision on children’s development as consumers. She explains the results of a
study of Malaysian schoolchildren which considers gender, family income and
personality traits in relation to television viewing habits and consumer behaviour
Television viewing and
consumer behaviour
YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004 67
TV VIEWING
Literature review
According to Nik Rahimah
et al (1994), childrenbecome consumers through a socialisation
process. Socialisation, as defined by Zigler and
Child (1969, cited in Gunter & Furnham,
1998), is a process by which individuals learn to
participate effectively in the social environment.
According to Ward (1974, cited in Gunter and
Furnham, 1998), the adaptation of this definition
to socialisation as a consumer was proposed
in the mid 1970s, as a vehicle for the study of
consumer behaviour. Ward defined consumer
socialisation as the process by which young people
acquire skills, knowledge and attitudes
relevant to their functioning as consumers in a
marketplace.
The importance of mass media as a socialisation
agent has received much attention in
consumer socialisation research (Moore
et al2002, Nik Rahimah
et al 1994,Ward 1972 andCaron & Ward 1975). Moore
et al (2002)asserted that market researchers have shown
television viewing can play a significant role in
the formation of consumer behaviour in young
people. Nik Rahimah
et al (1994) also highlightedthe fact the role of television in forming
children’s consumer behaviour is widely documented.
Ward (1972) explained the influence of
television in children’s consumer socialisation by
looking at children’s perceptions, judgment, and
understanding of television advertising. Ward
concluded that the older the child, the better the
child’s awareness of what advertising is and the
the greater understanding of the purpose of
advertising. Older children also tended to question
the credibility of the advertisements. In
Ward’s study with Caron (1975), he determined
the influence of television on children’s socialisation
by looking at their gift ideas. They
concluded that older children (ages 10 and
above) were more likely to cite television as the
source of gift ideas than friends.When considering
gender as a factor, no differences were
found.
In the study made by Nik Rahimah
et al(1994), they concluded that of three demographics
variables, age, gender and family
income, the most influential in explaining differences
in socialisation is the family income. The
result supported the findings made by Caron
and Ward (1975). They considered child’s age,
gender and social class as factors in consumer
socialisation. Social class was found to be the
most important variable in explaining a child’s
requested gift. In the survey, they concluded
that middle-class children (average family
income US$9,000) requested more gifts than
upper-class children (average family income
US$14,500). In addition, Goldberg (1990, cited
in Nik Rahimah
et al 1994) found low-incomechildren tended to purchase a greater number of
children’s cereals as compared to upper-middle
income children.
The important of income variable also can be
found in explaining the amount of time children
spend watching television. Comstock
et al(1978, cited in Nik Rahimah
et al 1994) foundthat children with lower income watched more
television than middle or upper-middle income
children. The study by Nik Rahimah
et al(1994) concluded family income is a strong
predictor of the time children spend watching
television.These findings also determined a link
between family income and children’s favourite
television programmes. Children from families
with higher monthly household income tended
Consumer socialisation
has been defined as the
process by which young
people acquire skills,
knowledge and attitudes
relevant to their
functioning as consumers
in a marketplace
68 YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004
TV VIEWING
to like watching cartoons, but they were also
interested in other types of programmes such as
dramas and thrillers. They also found that both
boys and girls like to watch cartoons, but the
girls preferred to watch dramas and movies as
well, while the boys liked thrillers.
In addition to demographic factors, the
importance of a child’s personality in connection
with television viewing has been widely
documented. For example, Schramm
et al(1961) explained that compared to a group of
children with medium and low IQ, children
with high IQ tended to watch less television.
Also children who found it difficult to make
friends watched more television than children
with many friends. Hess and Goldman (1962)
explained that children who watched a lot of television
tended to be lonely, shy, unmotivated
and spoilt. Whereas children who watched little
television were found to be happier, more flexible
in their personalities and more physically
active. Coats and Feldman (1995) stated that
television is an influential model for children’s
expression of nonverbal behaviour and emotion,
such as happiness, sadness, anger, fear and
disgust. Even though television has long been
recognised as affecting children’s understanding
of their world, a growing body of research suggests
it also affects understanding of their
emotions (Coats & Feldman 1995).
In summary, it may be seen that television
plays an important role in children’s consumer
socialisation. To further research in this area
this study considers family income, gender,
personality and television viewing habits as
variables in the development of children’s consumer
socialisation.
Methodology
Procedure
The respondents of this study were 138 primary
school children aged 10 to 12 years from
three schools in Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor,
Malaysia. Simple random sampling was used in
the survey and the structured questionnaire was
translated into Malay. Out of 138 questionnaires
distributed, 110 were returned complete and
usable.
Measurement
Consumer socialisation
The aspects of children’s consumer socialisation
included in this study are how much
television children watch, what they watch and
their purchasing behaviour.
Demographics
The children’s gender and family income are
considered as influences on their television
viewing and consumer socialisation. These
demographic factors have been documented as
a significant influence on the consumer socialisation
of Malaysian children (Ward & Caron
1975; Nik Rahimah
et al 1994).Personality
According to Mowen (1995), personality is
‘the distinctive patterns of behaviour, including
thoughts and emotions that characterise
each individual’s adaptation to the situations
of his or her life’. In previous literature ten
children’s personal characteristics have been
identified and may be measured using semantic
scales (Schramm et al 1961; Hess &
Goldmen 1962; Coats & Feldman; Mowen
1995). Following are details of the characteristics
measured:
Television is an influential
model for children’s
expression of nonverbal
behaviour and emotion,
such as happiness,
sadness, anger, fear
and disgust
YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004 69
TV VIEWING
■
C1 Aggressive passive■
C2 Studious playful■
C3 Rough gentle■
C4 Silent chatty■
C5 Alone friendly■
C6 Brave cowardly■
C7 Angry sensitive■
C8 Happy pensive■
C9 Self-reliant dependent■
C10 Competitive tolerantLimitations of the study
The study focuses exclusively on primary
school children in Bandar Baru Bangi in the
Selangor region, located in the western peninsula
of Malaysia. Hence the study represents
only part of the Selangor population.
Results
Sample characteristics
Table 1 show the demographic and socioeconomic
traits of the sample of children and their
parents. In the sample 18.2% were 10-yearolds,
36.4% were 11-year-olds and 44.5% were
12-year-olds. Most of the children came from
families of four children (30%) and a gross
household monthly income of RM2000
Child’s age
10 years 18.2
11 years 36.4
12 years 44.5
Gender
Male 40.9
Female 58.2
Number of children in family
1 0.9
2 3.6
3 14.5
4 30.0
5 20.0
6 12.7
7 9.1
8 or more 8.1
Adult assisting with questionnaire
Mother 59.1
Father 40.0
Sample: 138 children
Child’s position in family
Eldest 24.5
Second 20.9
Third 26.4
Fourth 17.3
Fifth 4.5
Sixth 2.7
Seventh or more 2.7
Parents’ education level
Primary school 7.3
Secondary school 36.4
Higher education 54.5
Parents’ profession
Executives 25.5
Professionals 18.2
Housewives 13.6
Clerks 10.0
Self-employed 8.2
Manual workers 9.1
Students 1.8
Monthly household income (gross)
RM2000 and above 70.0
Less than RM2000 26.4
Table 1 Sample characteristics (%)
TV VIEWING
(US$527) and above. Most children in the
sample were the third child in their family
(26.4%).
There were more girls than boys in the sample.
Most of the children were assisted in
completing the questionnaires by their mothers.
According to Warren (2002), female-dominant
samples are basically ordinary and it is appropriate
for mediation research because women are
more often primary caregivers.The level of education
of parents in the sample may be divided
into those with primary education only (7.3%),
those with secondary school education (36.4%)
and those with higher education (54.5%). Most
of the parents were executives (25.5%), professionals
(18.2%) and housewives (13.6%).
Demographic influences on socialisation
factors
As shown in Table 2, the family income is an
important factor in relation to the amount of
time
children
spent watching television each day. Analysis
showed that children from low income families
like to watch television between 8.30pm and
10.59pm. Children from high income families
tended to watch television between 5.00pm and
6.59pm and 8.30pm to 9.29pm. The amount of
time children spent watching television was not
influenced by gender. Boys and girls tended to
spend an equal amount of time each day watching
television.
In terms of the programmes the children
watched, gender and family income showed significant
effects. Of the two demographics
variables, gender constitutes a strong predictor
with p=0.00. The results showed boys were
interested in documentaries and girls preferred
programmes in a series.
Family income is the only demographic variable
to have a significant effect on children’s
purchase behaviour, as shown in Table 2. Family
income appeared to have a strong significant
70 YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004
Socialisation Gender Family income
factors
Chi-sq df p Chi-sq df p
Television viewing
from time/day 4.7 5 0.45 219.2 170 0.01
hours per day 1.8 3 0.62 95.0 102 0.67
hours per week 0.5 5 0.99 158.7 170 0.72
time of day viewing ends 0.3 3 0.95 113.4 102 0.21
Television programmes viewed
Programme category 8.5 4 0.07 95.3 136 1.00
Preferred type of programme 22.5 6 0.00 237.8 204 0.05
Purchasing behaviour
desire to own product seen on
television 3.4 4 0.49 154.3 136 0.13
frequency of request for product
seen on television programme 5.0 4 0.29 140.8 136 0.37
frequency of request for product
seen on television advertising 2.7 3 0.45 131.3 102 0.03
Level of significance p=0.05
Table 2 Chi square results – influence of demographic variables on consumer socialisation
YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004 71
TV VIEWING
effect in association with frequency of request to
purchase product seen on television advertising,
p=0.03. Gender did not exert a significance
influence on purchase behaviour.
The influence of personality on consumer
socialisation
Table 3 shows the relationship between the
children’s television viewing habits and their
personalities.The aggressive–passive (p=0.05)
and studious–playful (p=0.04) variables were
significant in relation to the amount of time
children spent watching television each day.
Children with more aggressive personalities
were more likely to watch television between
5pm and 6.59pm, and 8.30pm and 9.29pm, as
compared to children with passive tendencies
who mostly watched between 5pm and
6.59pm. Children who were keen on reading
preferred to watch between 5pm to 6.59pm
and 8.30pm to 9.29pm, whereas children with
playful characteristics preferred to watch
between 5.00pm and 6.59pm. Other personality
variables were not found to produce
significant effects in relation to time spent
watching television.
There was a relationship between number of
hours of television watched per week and
Socialisation Aggressive– Studious– Rough– Brave–
factors passive (C1) playful gentle(C3) cowardly (C6)
Chi-sq df p Chi-sq df p Chi-squ df p Chi-sq df p
Television viewing
from time/day 11.2 5 0.05 11.3 5 0.04 5.0 5 0.41 3.1 5 0.70
hours per day 2.0 3 0.58 0.86 3 0.84 1.7 3 0.64 1.2 3 0.76
hours per week 4.3 5 0.51 8.3 5 0.14 12.1 5 0.03 11.9 5 0.04
time of day viewing ends 2.1 3 0.55 0.05 3 1.00 4.1 3 0.24 2.7 3 0.44
Socialisation Aggressive– Rough– Competitive–
factors passive (C1) gentle(C3) tolerant (C10)
Chi-sq df p Chi-squ df p Chi-sq df p
Television programmes viewed
Programme category 1.9 4 0.75 3.1 4 0.54 4.0 4 0.40
Preferred type of programme 2.0 3 0.58 0.86 3 0.84 1.7 3 0.64
Socialisation Aggressive– Studious– Silent– Competitive–
factors passive (C1) playful chatty(C3) tolerant (C6)
Chi-sq df p Chi-sq df p Chi-squ df p Chi-sq df p
Purchasing behaviour
desire to own product seen on
television 3.4 4 0.50 7.6 4 0.04 1.5 4 0.82 10.3 4 0.04
frequency of request for product
seen on television programme 5.9 4 0.20 0.74 4 0.84 8.0 4 0.10 2.3 4 0.67
frequency of request for product
seen on television advertising 6.7 3 0.08 4.3 3 0.20 12.1 3 1.00 1.1 3 0.78
Level of significance p=0.1
Table 3 Chi square results – influence of personality traits on consumer socialisation
72 YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004
TV VIEWING
children with personality characteristics of
rough– gentle (p=0.03) and brave–cowardly
(p=0.04). Children with a ‘rough’ personality
watched between 16 to 25 hours of television
each week, compared to children with ‘gentle’
personalities who watched between 16 and 20
hours per week. Children with brave characteristics
watched 10 hours of television or less,
while children with cowardly characteristics
watched 16 to 20 hours per week.
The findings also showed that children with
studious–playful personality influences neared
a significant (p=0.14) relationship with the
number of hours of television watched per
week. The personality variables did not have a
significant association to the number of hours
watched per day and the time children stopped
watching television each day.
In terms of the programmes watched, children
with aggressive–passive and rough–gentle
personality traits were found to have significant
association with preferred programme types
and neared a significant effect for children with
competitive–tolerant personality traits
(p=0.15). The result showed that aggressive
and tolerant children preferred documentaries,
whereas for passive and competitive children
liked programmes running a series. There were
no other significant effects found for preferred
types of programme and personality.
The influence of personality on children’s
purchase behaviour is significant for four types
of personality as shown in Table 3. The studious–
playful and competitive–tolerant
personality traits were found to have significant
relationship with intention to own a product
seen on television, p=0.10 and p=0.04 respectively.
There was a significant relationship
between those with silent–chatty personality
traits and frequency of requests to purchase a
product seen on television (p=0.10). Children
with aggressive–passive traits were also found
to have a significant association (p=0.08) with
frequency of requests for a product seen on television.
Other personality variables were not
found to have significant effects on purchasing
behaviour.
Discussion and conclusion
The influence of television on children’s consumer
socialisation was examined in this study
by looking at the influence of demographic
variables and personality traits on television
viewing and purchase behaviour. Of the two
demographic variables, the most influential in
explaining differences in socialisation was the
child’s family income.
The statistical results with family income
functioning as a predictor indicates significant
findings in association with the amount of time
spent per day watching television, the preferred
type of programme and the frequency of
requests to purchase a product seen on television.
This finding partially supports the survey
made by Nik Rahimah (1994) in the association
between family income and frequency of
request to buy products seen on television.
Gender is less influential in explaining the
socialisation pattern. But gender should not be
discounted in future research into children’s
consumer socialisation. Gender is an important
variable in explaining the children’s consumer
socialisation as it has a particular influence on
the type of programmes preferred by children.
Not all of the personality variables had significant
effects on children’s consumer
There was a significant
relationship between
those with silent–chatty
personality traits and
frequency of requests
to purchase a product
seen on television
YOUNG CONSUMERS Quarter 4 2004 73
TV VIEWING
socialisation. Overall, of the six variables that
did show a relationship with consumer socialisation,
the most influential was the
aggressive–passive personality trait. The statistical
results with aggressive–passive
personality functioning as a predictor indicate
significant findings in association with the
amount of time children spent watching television
per day, the preferred type of programme
and the frequency of requests to purchase a
product seen on television. The studious–playful
personality trait showed significant
findings in association with the amount of time
children spent per day watching television, the
intention to own a product seen on television
and neared significant with the number of
hours spent watching television each week. As
mentioned by McNeal & Ji (1999) television is
the most important type of media in identifying
a product a child would like to buy.
Other significant personality traits were
rough–gentle, brave–cowardly, silent–chatty,
and competitive–tolerant. These traits were
found to have significant effects with some of
the socialisation variables. Although the personality
variables alone–friendly, happy–pensive
and self-reliant-dependent were less influential
they should still be considered by marketers.
Children’s personality traits are an important
consideration when devising a marketing strategy.
Marketers should take these characteristics
into account when developing their advertising
and research how children with different personalities
will perceive their ads. Future
research into children’s consumer socialisation
should consider a larger sample and perhaps
include different countries. Further demographic
variables could include nationality and
parental marital status to identify other influences
on children’s consumer socialisation.
Another way to increase the value of the survey
would be to include details of parents’ restrictions
on television viewing, the level and
effectiveness of such restrictions are now a significant
consideration for television advertisers.
References
Caron, A. and Ward, S. 1975. Gift decisions by
kids and parents.
Journal of AdvertisingResearch
, 15, 4 (August): pp.15–20.Coats E.J. & Feldman, R.S. 1995. The role of
television in the socialisation of nonverbal
behavioral skills.
Basic and applied socialpsychology
, 17(3): pp.327–341.Gunter, B. & Furnham, A. 1998.
Children asconsumers: a psychological analysis of the young
people’s market
. UK: Routledge.Hess, R.D. & Goldman, H. 1962. Parents’
view of the effect of television on their
children.
Child development, 33:pp.411–426.
McNeal, J.U. 1992.
Kids as consumers: a handbookof marketing to children
. New York: Macmillan.McNeal, J.U. and Ji. M.F. 1999. Chinese children
as consumers: an analysis of their new product
information sources.
Journal of ConsumerMarketing
, 16, pp.1–18.Moore, J.N
et al 2002. Age and consumersocialisation agent influences on adolescents’
sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior:
implications for social marketing initiatives
and public policy.
Journal of Public Policy& Marketing
, 21 (1), Spring: pp.37–52.Mowen, J.C. 1995.
Consumer behavior. Fourthedition. US: Prentice Hall.
Nik Rahimah, N.Y.
et al 1994. Influenceof television on children’s consumer
socialization.
Malaysian ManagementReview
, 29: pp.8-14.Schiffman, L.G. and Kanuk, L.L. 1997.
Consumer behavior
. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Schramm,W., Lyle, J., and Edwin, P.B. 1961.
Television in the lives of our children.
California:Stanford University Press.
Stipp, H. 1993. New ways to reach children.
1993.
American demographics, August:pp.50–56.
Ward, S. 1972. Children’s reactions to
commercials.
Journal of advertising research,12, 2 (April): pp.37–45.
Noor Hasmini Abd Ghani
is a lecturer ofmarketing and Head of the Marketing Department
at Utara University Utara, Malaysia. Noor Hasmini’s
research interests are children’s consumer
socialisation, children’s attitudes, advertising
and promotions, consumer brand and relationship
marketing.
منتظر نظرتان هستم